If the Devil took human form, with 4 eyes and two ears this is how he would look

Serbia must face reality and start dealing with Kosovo institutions if it wants to join the European Union, Martti Ahtisaari, an architect of Kosovo's independence plan said on Tuesday. Last year Kosovo declared independence after nine years of United Nations stewardship, but the pro-Western government in Belgrade does not recognise it and refuses to deal with elected Kosovo Albanian officials. 

Various forms of financial support, including Russian investments in the infrastructure of Serbia, will be discussed during the coming visit of Russian President Dmitry Medvedev to that country, Serb Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremic said in an interview with the Kommersant newspaper. "We hope that after the visit of President Medvedev our economic cooperation will enter a new stage covering all branches of the economy," Jeremic said.

In his opinion, the coming visit of President Medvedev, scheduled for October 20, will be "history-making." "Because of a number of historic factors, this is going to be the first official visit of a Russian president to the Republic of Serbia. This is why we believe this is a history-making event. Despite the fact that the integration in the European Union is a matter of strategic priority for Serbia, Russia has been in the past and continues to be our best friend," Jeremic stressed.   

The ten UN judges at the International Court of Justice who supported the opinion that Kosovo's Declaration of Independence on February 17, 2008 does not violate general international law are, at best, incompetent charlatans; at worst, they are towing the line of the gray, malevolent forces which wish to create a Kosovo Mafia State in the Balkans. And after all, anyone can declare himself the King of Saturn and issue certificates selling its rings...

The "ruling" of the International Court of Justice on the status of Kosovo's independence holds as much influence over international law, creates as much jurisprudence, as the "opinion" of a first-year law student opining on some hypothetical case in an academic debate. Today's "ruling" is in fact no more than a non-binding statement after a "hearing" among 14 judges at the ICJ. A "hearing" whose results had to be postponed because of the severe degree of disagreement among those involved.